In my mind, this is a huge waste of effort. Put a base on Mars instead of the Moon -- there's huge science finds waiting there to be discovered; a whole new ecosystem that we've barely touched. The Moon won't be a stepping stone for Mars, it will cost nearly the same to get there as Mars, and we've already been, why go back?
But the tech looks cool.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6208456.stm
Monday, December 4, 2006
Popular Posts
-
I had the pleasure to attend the IBM Think conference in wet and chilly San Fran from Feb 11-14th of this year. The event overall was ...
-
Brad Dalton is the first to admit his theory is far-fetched: that bacteria could account for odd light emissions, as well as the reddish hue...
-
In a mine in California, scientists found the smallest bacteria so far discovered -- living in conditions as acidic as battery acid. Why thi...
-
Some good stuff from a Canadian futurist: - The rising power of the knowledge worker - Continuous training replaces job security; respect is...
-
It's been almost exaclty three years since I've updated this blog. In that three years, I've achieved a lot -- I've gone aft...
-
Very dry, dull book with some basic financial info like ROI and cash flow. Not a lot here.
-
Here's my (edited) journal entry for this event dated 12/01/98: Wow. I just sessioned and started reading "The Tao of Physics...
-
Nother confirmation Of einstein... the first images of light escaping a black hole show that they lose energy. In this case, it was a superm...
-
The secret papers obtained from the US military give an insight into an astonishing chain of events sparked by UFO sightings over East Angli...
-
Not a bad audio book, but I expected more. Big ideas: Build a high performance, high-trust culture; Identify desired results and un...