Ive had a suspicion for a while that despite the astonishing success of the first generation of computer scientists like Shannon, Turing, von Neumann, and Wiener, somehow they didnt get a few important starting points quite right, and some things in the foundations of computer science are fundamentally askew. In a way I have no right to say this and it would be more appropriate to say it once Ive actually got something to take its place, so let me just emphasize that this is speculative. But where might things have gone wrong?
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier03/lanier_index.html
Popular Posts
-
... or, Decemberween. Whatever. http://www.homestarrunner.com/xmas04.html
-
It's been almost exaclty three years since I've updated this blog. In that three years, I've achieved a lot -- I've gone aft...
-
Very dry, dull book with some basic financial info like ROI and cash flow. Not a lot here.
-
"The fish was delish and it made quite a dish." http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail120.html
-
Here's my (edited) journal entry for this event dated 12/01/98: Wow. I just sessioned and started reading "The Tao of Physics...
-
After a year of hell, I've been given a reprieve. I've spent the last year dealing with contracts, negotiation, budgeting, and confl...
-
Kids sick. Hiyat sick. Me sick. Everybody sick. No fun. Seriously. Zack just gets over having baby measels and everybody in the house co...
-
I'm sure someone else has written the rules of business out in terms of the Bushido, but here's my take: Truthfulness You must speak...
-
Nother confirmation Of einstein... the first images of light escaping a black hole show that they lose energy. In this case, it was a superm...
-
A decent stab at being an intellectual thriller. Follows a pretty standard trope of man creating AI as an innocent, childlike figure... and ...